|Eingestellt in Kategorie:
Dieser Artikel ist nicht vorrätig.
Ähnlichen Artikel verkaufen?

The Positive Case for Negative Campaigning - 022620216X, Kyle Mattes, Taschenbuch

Artikelzustand:
Gut
Preis:
US $10,23
Ca.CHF 9,30
Versand:
Kostenlos Standard Shipping. Weitere Detailsfür Versand
Standort: Memphis, Tennessee, USA
Lieferung:
Lieferung zwischen Sa, 25. Mai und Mi, 29. Mai nach 43230 bei heutigem Zahlungseingang
Wir wenden ein spezielles Verfahren zur Einschätzung des Liefertermins an – in diese Schätzung fließen Faktoren wie die Entfernung des Käufers zum Artikelstandort, der gewählte Versandservice, die bisher versandten Artikel des Verkäufers und weitere ein. Insbesondere während saisonaler Spitzenzeiten können die Lieferzeiten abweichen.
Rücknahmen:
30 Tage Rückgabe. Käufer zahlt Rückversand. Weitere Details- Informationen zu Rückgaben
Zahlungen:
     

Sicher einkaufen

eBay-Käuferschutz
Geld zurück, wenn etwas mit diesem Artikel nicht stimmt. 

Angaben zum Verkäufer

Angemeldet als gewerblicher Verkäufer
Der Verkäufer ist für dieses Angebot verantwortlich.
eBay-Artikelnr.:295549324881
Zuletzt aktualisiert am 04. Mai. 2024 04:17:32 MESZAlle Änderungen ansehenAlle Änderungen ansehen

Artikelmerkmale

Artikelzustand
Gut: Buch, das gelesen wurde, sich aber in einem guten Zustand befindet. Der Einband weist nur sehr ...
Book Title
The Positive Case for Negative Campaigning
ISBN
9780226202167
Publication Year
2015
Type
Textbook
Format
Trade Paperback
Language
English
Publication Name
Positive Case for Negative Campaigning
Item Height
0.1in
Author
David P. Redlawsk, Kyle Mattes
Item Length
0.9in
Publisher
University of Chicago Press
Item Width
0.6in
Item Weight
14.4 Oz
Number of Pages
256 Pages

Über dieses Produkt

Product Information

Turn on the television or sign in to social media during election season and chances are you'll see plenty of negative campaigning. For decades, conventional wisdom has held that Americans hate negativity in political advertising, and some have even argued that its pervasiveness in recent seasons has helped to drive down voter turnout. Arguing against this commonly held view, Kyle Mattes and David P. Redlawsk show not only that some negativity is accepted by voters as part of the political process, but that negative advertising is necessary to convey valuable information that would not otherwise be revealed. The most comprehensive treatment of negative campaigning to date, The Positive Case for Negative Campaigning uses models, surveys, and experiments to show that much of the seeming dislike of negative campaigning can be explained by the way survey questions have been worded. By failing to distinguish between baseless and credible attacks, surveys fail to capture differences in voters' receptivity. Voters' responses, the authors argue, vary greatly and can be better explained by the content and believability of the ads than by whether the ads are negative. Mattes and Redlawsk continue on to establish how voters make use of negative information and why it is necessary. Many voters are politically na ve and unlikely to make inferences about candidates' positions or traits, so the ability of candidates to go on the attack and focus explicitly on information that would not otherwise be available is crucial to voter education.

Product Identifiers

Publisher
University of Chicago Press
ISBN-10
022620216x
ISBN-13
9780226202167
eBay Product ID (ePID)
27038267509

Product Key Features

Author
David P. Redlawsk, Kyle Mattes
Publication Name
Positive Case for Negative Campaigning
Format
Trade Paperback
Language
English
Publication Year
2015
Type
Textbook
Number of Pages
256 Pages

Dimensions

Item Length
0.9in
Item Height
0.1in
Item Width
0.6in
Item Weight
14.4 Oz

Additional Product Features

Lc Classification Number
Jk2281.M388 2014
Reviews
What is the appropriate response to the coming deluge of negativity? Mattes and Redlawsk make a convincing case that the most appropriate response is 'so what?' . . . The Positive Case for Negative Campaigning is both engaging and important. In casting a more nuanced lens on one of the most maligned forms of political communication, this book should lead scholars to new agendas and research questions., The campaign ads from 2012 were more negative than the ads in 2008, 2008's were more negative than 2004's and, you guessed it, 2004's more negative than 2000's. But far from disparaging the form, . . . I celebrate it. Negative campaigning is a genuine positive for democracy. I come to my understanding from paging through a new book, The Positive Case for Negative Campaigning , by Kyle Mattes and David P. Redlawsk., Students of campaigns and elections will find this book informative, and practitioners will benefit from the many examples that support the sophisticated political science. . . . Recommended., What is the appropriate response to the coming deluge of negativity? Mattes and Redlawsk make a convincing case that the most appropriate response is 'so what?' . . .  The Positive Case for Negative Campaigning is both engaging and important. In casting a more nuanced lens on one of the most maligned forms of political communication, this book should lead scholars to new agendas and research questions., As America continues to polarize, the frequency of attacks in campaigns will only increase. Despite evidence showing that negativity has many payoffs, there is still substantial doubt about such claims. This book enters that breach with a timely array of data and theory that should find many interested readers., The Positive Case for Negative Campaigning is a useful and needed reminder not to slide into the habit of bemoaning negative campaigning. It is a trap that is easy to fall into, especially given media narratives about negative campaigns. But Mattes and Redlawsk examine the topic with fresh eyes, pointing out that it is as easy to lie about oneself in a positive ad as it is to lie about an opponent in a negative ad. At the same time, the book is a useful reminder that voters are more competent than we sometimes may believe., Much ink has been spilled to investigate the effects of negativity in politics, but our understanding of this topic remains speculative at best. Readers who are serious about cracking this nut must read this book. Mattes and Redlawsk reconceptualize the concept of negativity in political campaigns, showing that it is not merely instances of one candidate talking about an opponent--as most studies consider it to be--but a far more complicated and multidimensional concept that must take into account substantive content. Readers are guaranteed to experience an 'ah-ha!' moment at least a few times., There's no question that a negative association with politics exists in the United States and other nations. Yet, the waves of negativity many people claim to dislike in campaigning may not be as vilified as we've been led to believe. Mattes and Redlawsk's new book attempts to shift academic research and popular thinking on this important subject.
Table of Content
Acknowledgments Chapter 1 Introduction Chapter 2 Voters and Negativity, and Why the Media Can't Help with Stefan Mancevski Chapter 3 What Do Voters Think? Social Desirability and Attitudes about Negativity Chapter 4 Examining Voter Response to Real Campaign Ads Chapter 5 Modeling Negativity Chapter 6 That Ad Said What? The Importance of Ad Credibility Chapter 7 How the Possibility of Lies Damages Voter Confidence in Negativity Chapter 8 Conclusion Appendix A: Details of Video Ads Used in Study 4 Appendix B: Appendix to Chapter 5 Notes References Index
Copyright Date
2015
Target Audience
Scholarly & Professional
Topic
Political Process / Media & Internet, Political Process / Campaigns & Elections, Journalism
Lccn
2014-018277
Dewey Decimal
324.70973
Dewey Edition
23
Illustrated
Yes
Genre
Language Arts & Disciplines, Political Science

Artikelbeschreibung des Verkäufers