|Eingestellt in Kategorie:
Ähnlichen Artikel verkaufen?

Eine Modelldisziplin: Politikwissenschaft und die Logik der Repräsentationen von Clarke

Artikelzustand:
Neuwertig
Preis:
US $28,00
Ca.CHF 25,61
Versand:
US $4,95 (ca. CHF 4,53) Sparversand. Weitere Detailsfür Versand
Standort: Clemmons, North Carolina, USA
Lieferung:
Lieferung zwischen Fr, 31. Mai und Mo, 3. Jun nach 43230 bei heutigem Zahlungseingang
Wir wenden ein spezielles Verfahren zur Einschätzung des Liefertermins an – in diese Schätzung fließen Faktoren wie die Entfernung des Käufers zum Artikelstandort, der gewählte Versandservice, die bisher versandten Artikel des Verkäufers und weitere ein. Insbesondere während saisonaler Spitzenzeiten können die Lieferzeiten abweichen.
Rücknahmen:
14 Tage Rückgabe. Käufer zahlt Rückversand. Weitere Details- Informationen zu Rückgaben
Zahlungen:
     

Sicher einkaufen

eBay-Käuferschutz
Geld zurück, wenn etwas mit diesem Artikel nicht stimmt. 

Angaben zum Verkäufer

Angemeldet als gewerblicher Verkäufer
Der Verkäufer ist für dieses Angebot verantwortlich.
eBay-Artikelnr.:165723015246

Artikelmerkmale

Artikelzustand
Neuwertig: Buch, das wie neu aussieht, aber bereits gelesen wurde. Der Einband weist keine ...
Publication Date
2012-01-20
Pages
232
ISBN
9780195382204
Publication Year
2012
Type
Textbook
Format
Trade Paperback
Language
English
Publication Name
Model Discipline : Political Science and the Logic of Representations
Item Height
0.5in
Author
Kevin A. Clarke, David M. Primo
Item Length
6in
Publisher
Oxford University Press, Incorporated
Item Width
9in
Item Weight
12.3 Oz
Number of Pages
232 Pages

Über dieses Produkt

Product Information

Political science is an increasingly model-driven discipline. Political scientists use models--formal and informal, quantitative and qualitative--to investigate and illuminate causal mechanisms, study patterns in datasets, and understand the conditions under which certain outcomes are expected to occur. But how do political scientists justify and rationalize this method? Why test predictions from a deductive, and thus truth-preserving, system? David Primo and Kevin Clarke tackle these important questions in this novel work of methodology.

Product Identifiers

Publisher
Oxford University Press, Incorporated
ISBN-10
019538220x
ISBN-13
9780195382204
eBay Product ID (ePID)
25038608477

Product Key Features

Author
Kevin A. Clarke, David M. Primo
Publication Name
Model Discipline : Political Science and the Logic of Representations
Format
Trade Paperback
Language
English
Publication Year
2012
Type
Textbook
Number of Pages
232 Pages

Dimensions

Item Length
6in
Item Height
0.5in
Item Width
9in
Item Weight
12.3 Oz

Additional Product Features

Number of Volumes
1 Vol.
Lc Classification Number
Ja71.C528 2011
Reviews
"This is an outstanding book that should be read, thought about, and discussed by every political scientist. Professors Clarke and Primo provide a clear discussion of what models are, a persuasive critique of current practice in the discipline, and solid guidance for how to effectively assess models of all types. This is a must-read."--Andrew D. Martin, Professor of Law and Political Science, Washington University in St. Louis"This is not a book for those who need the comforts of conventional wisdom. It mounts a powerful challenge to our prevailing orthodoxies, both theoretical and methodological. This is fresh, aggressive thinking--a joy to encounter."--Christopher Achen, Princeton University"This smart book proposes two things simultaneously for political scientists. First, we ought to have a consensus on what we should not do with our models, and that is we should not insist on testing them as models. But second, we also ought to allow for diversity in what our theoretical models can do, how they are judged, and how they are structured. They argue that models ought to be judged based on how useful they are. The same can be said for books-and thisis a very useful book."--Ken Kollman, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, "This is an outstanding book that should be read, thought about, and discussed by every political scientist. Professors Clarke and Primo provide a clear discussion of what models are, a persuasive critique of current practice in the discipline, and solid guidance for how to effectively assess models of all types. This is a must-read."--Andrew D. Martin, Professor of Law and Political Science, Washington University in St. Louis "This is not a book for those who need the comforts of conventional wisdom. It mounts a powerful challenge to our prevailing orthodoxies, both theoretical and methodological. This is fresh, aggressive thinking--a joy to encounter."--Christopher Achen, Princeton University "This smart book proposes two things simultaneously for political scientists. First, we ought to have a consensus on what we should not do with our models, and that is we should not insist on testing them as models. But second, we also ought to allow for diversity in what our theoretical models can do, how they are judged, and how they are structured. They argue that models ought to be judged based on how useful they are. The same can be said for books-and this is a very useful book."--Ken Kollman, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, "This is an outstanding book that should be read, thought about, and discussed by every political scientist. Professors Clarke and Primo provide a clear discussion of what models are, a persuasive critique of current practice in the discipline, and solid guidance for how to effectively assess models of all types. This is a must-read."--Andrew D. Martin, Professor of Law and Political Science, Washington University in St. Louis "This is not a book for those who need the comforts of conventional wisdom. It mounts a powerful challenge to our prevailing orthodoxies, both theoretical and methodological. This is fresh, aggressive thinking-a joy to encounter."--Christopher Achen, Princeton University "This smart book proposes two things simultaneously for political scientists. First, we ought to have a consensus on what we should not do with our models, and that is we should not insist on testing them as models. But second, we also ought to allow for diversity in what our theoretical models can do, how they are judged, and how they are structured. They argue that models ought to be judged based on how useful they are. The same can be said for books-and this is a very useful book."--Ken Kollman, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor "This is an outstanding book that should be read, thought about, and discussed by every political scientist. Professors Clarke and Primo provide a clear discussion of what models are, a persuasive critique of current practice in the discipline, and solid guidance for how to effectively assess models of all types."--Andrew D. Martin, Washington University in St. Louis, "This is an outstanding book that should be read, thought about, and discussed by every political scientist. Professors Clarke and Primo provide a clear discussion of what models are, a persuasive critique of current practice in the discipline, and solid guidance for how to effectively assess models of all types. This is a must-read."--Andrew D. Martin, Professor of Law and Political Science, Washington University in St. Louis"This is not a book for those who need the comforts of conventional wisdom. It mounts a powerful challenge to our prevailing orthodoxies, both theoretical and methodological. This is fresh, aggressive thinking--a joy to encounter."--Christopher Achen, Princeton University"This smart book proposes two things simultaneously for political scientists. First, we ought to have a consensus on what we should not do with our models, and that is we should not insist on testing them as models. But second, we also ought to allow for diversity in what our theoretical models can do, how they are judged, and how they are structured. They argue that models ought to be judged based on how useful they are. The same can be said for books-and this is a very useful book."--Ken Kollman, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, "This is an outstanding book that should be read, thought about, and discussed by every political scientist. Professors Clarke and Primo provide a clear discussion of what models are, a persuasive critique of current practice in the discipline, and solid guidance for how to effectively assess models of all types. This is a must-read."--Andrew D. Martin, Professor of Law and Political Science, Washington University in St. Louis
Table of Content
Preface 1 A Model Discipline 1.1 The Model in Political Science 1.2 Metaphors and Analogies, Fables and Fictions 1.3 The broad themes of the book 1.3.1 Science is not what we think it is 1.3.2 Current practice is not "philosophy-free" 1.3.3 Models are objects 1.3.4 Models are not tested with data 1.3.5 Explanation 1.4 Plan of the Book 1.5 What this Book is Not 2 The Science in Political Science 2.1 Introduction 2.2 What Political Scientists Say They Are Doing 2.3 Hypothetico-Deductivism 2.4 Problems with H-D 2.4.1 Deductions are Truth-Preserving 2.4.2 Data Can't Speak for Themselves 2.4.3 Other Problems with H-D 2.5 How We Got Here 2.5.1 Logical Positivism 2.5.2 Pathologies of Rational Choice 2.5.3 Methods and Models 2.5.4 The Empirical Implications of Theoretical Models 2.6 Conclusion 3 What is a Model? 3.1 Introduction 3.2 Models as Maps 3.3 A Few Examples 3.4 The Received View of Scientific Theories 3.5 The Semantic Conception of Scientific Theories 3.6 The Model-Based View of Scientific Theories 3.7 Models and Theories 3.8 Conclusion 4 Theoretical Models 4.1 Introduction 4.2 Aspects of Theoretical Models 4.3 The Purposes of Models 4.3.1 Foundational Models 4.3.2 Organizational Models 4.3.3 Exploratory Models 4.3.4 Predictive Models 4.4 Judging a Theoretical Model 4.4.1 Prediction is the Wrong Standard (Usually) 4.4.2 The Illusion of Precise Standards 4.4.3 Dimensions of Usefulness 4.5 Conclusion 5 Empirical Models 5.1 Introduction 5.2 What is an Empirical Model? 5.2.1 A Model-Based Understanding 5.3 The Purposes of Empirical Models 5.4 The Illogic of Theory Testing 5.4.1 Falsificationism 5.4.2 Verificationism 5.4.3 Bayesian Confirmation 5.5 The Other Uses of Empirical Modeling 5.6 Conclusion 6 Explanation 6.1 Introduction 6.2 Existing justifications 6.3 Explanation 6.3.1 What constitutes an explanation? 6.3.2 Explanation in Political Science 6.4 Models as explanations 6.5 Choosing among explanations 6.5.1 Comparative Model Testing 6.5.2 Is choosing necessary? 6.6 Conclusion 7 Conclusion 7.1 Introduction 7.2 Review of the argument 7.3 Issues and counterarguments Bibliography
Copyright Date
2011
Topic
History & Theory, General, Référence, Research
Lccn
2011-015267
Dewey Decimal
320
Intended Audience
Scholarly & Professional
Dewey Edition
22
Illustrated
Yes
Genre
Social Science, Political Science

Artikelbeschreibung des Verkäufers

Jim Crotts Rare Books (crottsy)

Jim Crotts Rare Books (crottsy)

99,9% positive Bewertungen
23 Tsd. Artikel verkauft
Shop besuchenKontakt
Antwortet meist innerhalb 24 Stunden

Detaillierte Verkäuferbewertungen

Durchschnitt in den letzten 12 Monaten

Genaue Beschreibung
5.0
Angemessene Versandkosten
4.9
Lieferzeit
5.0
Kommunikation
5.0
Angemeldet als gewerblicher Verkäufer

Verkäuferbewertungen (10'919)

r***r (1304)- Bewertung vom Käufer.
Letzter Monat
Bestätigter Kauf
nice item
l***l (1082)- Bewertung vom Käufer.
Letzter Monat
Bestätigter Kauf
Thank you
n***u (626)- Bewertung vom Käufer.
Letzter Monat
Bestätigter Kauf
Great transaction!